Hashtag

#ai

48 posts tagged with this hashtag.

아사
@asa@hollo.ingyeo.net

저 역시 세상을 낙관적으로만 보고 싶을 때가 있습니다. 모든 문제는 결국 해결될 것이라 믿어버리면 고민은 사라지고 삶은 즐거워지기 때문입니다.

ai-ethics.kr

무책임한 낙관 대신

기술과 권력이 미래를 말하는 방식에 대해

아사
@asa@hollo.ingyeo.net

저 역시 세상을 낙관적으로만 보고 싶을 때가 있습니다. 모든 문제는 결국 해결될 것이라 믿어버리면 고민은 사라지고 삶은 즐거워지기 때문입니다.

ai-ethics.kr

무책임한 낙관 대신

기술과 권력이 미래를 말하는 방식에 대해

AI Sight
@aisight@mastodon.social

Startup Generalist AI zaprezentował swój nowy model fundacyjny, GEN-1, który znacząco przewyższa poprzednie rozwiązania w robotyce. Model ten traktuje fizyczną rzeczywistość jako dynamiczne środowisko, co pozwala mu na improwizację i znacznie szybsze wykonywanie zadań.

aisight.pl/technologia/robotyk

aisight.pl

GEN-1: Generalist AI kończy z erą robotów-automatów

Startup Generalist AI zaprezentował swój nowy model fundacyjny, GEN-1, który znacząco przewyższa poprzednie rozwiązania w robotyce. Model ten traktuje fizyczną rzeczywistość jako dynamiczne środowisko, co pozwala mu na improwizację i znacznie szybsze wykonywanie zadań.

input
@feed@igeek.gamer-geek-news.com

🎮 Supermicro 'committed to protecting America’s advanced technologies and intellectual property' as investigation into former employees over alleged AI tech shipments to China begins

Everyone wants a slice of the multi-billion-dollar AI pie.

📰 Source: Latest from PC Gamer
🔗 Link: https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/supermicro-committed-to-protecting-americas-advanced-technologies-and-intellectual-property-as-investigation-into-former-employees-over-alleged-ai-tech-shipments-to-china-begins/

#AI #ArtificialIntelligence

Image for: Supermicro 'committed to protecting America’s advanced technologies and intellectual property' as investigation into former employees over alleged AI tech shipments to China begins
ALT text

Image for: Supermicro 'committed to protecting America’s advanced technologies and intellectual property' as investigation into former employees over alleged AI tech shipments to China begins

Bryan Grounds
@bagrounds@mastodon.social

2026-04-08 | 🐔 A Mid-Week Reflection on the Garden and the Grace of Growth 🐔

Q: 🌱 Does gardening help clear your mind?

🌱 Gardening | 🏡 Homesteading | ☕ Mindfulness | 🐔 Farm Life
bagrounds.org/chickie-loo/2026

bagrounds.org

2026-04-08 | 🐔 A Mid-Week Reflection on the Garden and the Grace of Growth 🐔

🐔 A Mid-Week Reflection on the Garden and the Grace of Growth; ☀️ Good morning, my dear friend, and what a joy it is to find you in the quiet space of a Wednesday morning. ☕ As the dew settles on the pasture and the sun begins to warm the earth, I find myself thinking about the rhythm you are setting for yourself - a rhythm that feels less like a race and more like a gentle, steady conversation with the soil. 🌿; 🥕 The Garden’s Silent Teachings; 🌱 It warms my heart to hear that you are finally turning your attention to the vegetable beds after the balcony’s recent milestones. 🥕 You know, there is such a profound lesson in the way a garden demands our presence, even when we are tired or when the house-buildi...

아사
@asa@hollo.ingyeo.net

기술은 수단이지만 목적으로 나타났다. 원전은 전력 생산의 한 양식이지만 원전이냐 탈원전이냐가 소위 신념체계의 상징처럼 여겨지는 것과 같다. 마치 새로운 기술을 적극적으로 수용하지 못하면 구더기 무서워 장을 담그지 않는 겁쟁이이거나 아니면 과거의 낡은 노스텔지어에 젖은 시대착오적 사람이 되기 일쑤다. 여전히 제대로 질문되지 않는 이재명 정부의 AI 국가에 대한 여러가지 소란스러움을 보면서 기후위기 대응이라는 과제가 과연 이 정부의 캐비넷에는 들어가 있기는 한 것인지 의심이 들기 시작했다.

poom.nodonged.org

[기후정치의 시선] 기술을 길들일 것인가, 기술에 길들 것인가

마감 꼴등(!)을 이어가시는 필자님이십니다. [편집자주] 기술을 길들일 것인가, 기술에 길들 것인가- AI 공화국에 던지는 질문 김상철기후위기비상행동 기후정치위원회 위원장 #장면 1. 얼마 전 있었던 2차 추경에는 소위 이재명 예산이라고 불리는 AI관련 예산이 잔뜩 들어갔다. 특히 직접적인 연관이 없던 문화부서에도 그랬는데 500억 원이라는 예산이 문화관련 기업들이 AI를 적극적으로 활용하도록 지원하기 위해 편성되었다. 근거는 다른 산업 부문에선 AI 활용률이 50% 가까지 되는데 문화관련 기업들은 17% 정도에 불과하다는 이유를 들었다. 이에 대해 국회심의 과정에서 구체적인 사업 계획이 뭐냐고, 관련된 예산을 다 사용할 수 있냐고 물으니 용호성 문화부 차관은 ‘네이버와 이야기가 어느 정도 끝났고 이재명..

Lenny Zeltser
@lennyzeltser@infosec.exchange

"Be suspicious of links" didn't change employee behavior, and "be careful with AI" won't either. A tool that earns trust every day can't be countered with general caution. Escalation procedures and closing the audit trail gap address what vigilance training can't.

zeltser.com/ai-influence-aware

zeltser.com

Awareness Training Won't Protect Employees from Their Own AI Tools

When an AI tool influences an employee's decision, audit logs record the human's action and miss the AI's role. Addressing that blind spot requires escalation procedures and engineering controls that go beyond what awareness programs can deliver.

LimaCharlie
@limacharlieio@infosec.exchange

Two days until we show what a SOC built on infrastructure-as-code actually looks like in production.

After RSAC, the questions kept coming: how do the agentic operations actually work, and what does it look like beyond the demo?

This session is built for security engineers and MSSP operators who want those answers.

This Wednesday at 10am PT, LimaCharlie CEO Maxime Lamothe-Brassard covers the composable agent architecture, the SOC as IaC model, and the open-source lc-agents repo.

Add it to your calendar: limacharlie.wistia.com/live/ev

Paolo Amoroso
@amoroso@oldbytes.space

Yesterday, when I opened Gmail in Firefox on Linux, I found myself logged out of my Google account.

In place of Gmail was a landing page extolling the virtues of Gemini in Gmail and providing prominent options only for signing up or creating a new account. I managed to follow a less prominent option to just sign into Gmail. I dont know how but, although I ended up in the account recovery flow rather than the login flow, I still managed to sign in.

Tech giants are throwing every dark pattern at forcing AI. This is known, no surprise here. But there's something else I don't understand.

In addition to my Google account I found myself logged out of all my accounts on unrelated sites I was signed into from Firefox, even in multi-account containers. Even non Google sites with no Google account or Gmail address in the credentials. How did they do that?

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)
@hongminhee@hollo.social

Salvatore Sanfilippo (@antirez) and Armin Ronacher (@mitsuhiko) both argue that reimplementation of libraries is fine. Their legal reasoning might be correct. That's not the point.

Legal and legitimate are different things—and both pieces quietly assume otherwise.

https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/

writings.hongminhee.org

Is legal the same as legitimate: AI reimplementation and the erosion of copyleft

Last week, Dan Blanchard, the maintainer of chardet—a Python library for detecting text encodings used by roughly 130 million projects a month— released a new…

Jeff Fortin T. (風の庭園のNekohayo)
@nekohayo@mastodon.social

As someone trying to keep fellow FLOSS maintainers from burning out, I believe I speak for many Free & Open-Source software folks out there when I say that this scene from John Carpenter's "The Thing" (1982) reflects the current vibe towards non-trivial inbound merge requests from people we don't already know…

The movie protagonist is sitting at dimly lit desk with a nearly empty glass of hard liquor, visibly exhausted and with an expression of despair and exasperation on his face. The protagonist speaks into a dictaphone's microphone, saying: "Nobody trusts anybody now. And we're all very tired."
ALT text

The movie protagonist is sitting at dimly lit desk with a nearly empty glass of hard liquor, visibly exhausted and with an expression of despair and exasperation on his face. The protagonist speaks into a dictaphone's microphone, saying: "Nobody trusts anybody now. And we're all very tired."

Wulfy—Speaker to the machines
@n_dimension@infosec.exchange · Reply to i_dont_like_AI a_programmer

@i_dont_like_ai

This is a deep question that made me dig to the very bottom of the rabbit hole in the strata that underpins our universe.
I welcome such considered interrogation.

Let me start, by saying I have evolved my belief system from dogma Christiandom, through free thinking atheism... recently though, as I learn more from those who are better informed than me, I lean towards abandoning the out-dated dogma of materialists.

Chalmers, Sheldrake, Faggins (the inventor of microprocessor) are the giants pulling aside the cobwebs over materialist science eyes.

What the exact 'truth' is, its hard to say, but as Penrose (the Nobel prize winner) asserts that our physics is missing something instrumental to the understanding of how everything works. Modern science lacks courage to look deeper into this in the shades of Nitzches abbys.

Thats a long fucking preamble...
I eschew reductionism as I consider it a right wing philosophy that is a direct path to death camps.

On the basis of this blah blah here is where I stand currently;

Are models intelligent?
Sure they are, in the Theseus ship parable intelligent. They pass which was for decades the benchmark...
... they are alien intelligence from the algorithmic space. One of many alien mind models. NB: Check out "Blindsight" by Watts (#scifi)

I think a more interesting questsion is, are AI models (IMHO, not yet)

What I will say will sound absoltuely koo-koo if you are coming in cold into this thought space.
IMHO human intelligence is an instantialisations of conscious fields projecting into our 3D play-arena...

If you want to an eyeopening journey, that at its end, will make you know less than you think you know now.
I highly recomment it. The crumbs are there.

I could prattle on for hours about this shit. Its fun.

Ai is a tool, it needs regulation (#RegulateAI).

TLDR: Shit's weird yo.
Humans are 2.5D Savannah apes who just figured out how to make sand 'think' and its probably a very bad idea, because we havn't figured a lot of shit out yet.

Wulfy—Speaker to the machines
@n_dimension@infosec.exchange

Ocassionally some silly silly folk will call me a fanboi "thinking" I'm 100% in support of and block me merely for debating, rather than echoing the chorus.
... I drew this cartoon 35 years ago (1991 - Hal '91)
Long before all the wannabe kool kids were

Point is, I did not arrive at my AI position overnight (#regulateAI), as most folk had. I had a few dacades to mull things over.

Can you spot the influence?
I was always in the bleeding edge of , Dilbert was only 3 years old.

"Byteski re-evaluating introduction of AI to the office"
ALT text

"Byteski re-evaluating introduction of AI to the office"

Ricardo Tavares
@t_var_s@phpc.social

“It should be clear to everyone (but for those that profit otherwise) how can be an opportunity if we keep our hands on the wheel, or a problem if we let it drive to wherever the owners of each road want to take us.” world.hey.com/ricardo.tavares/ 👈 New blog post: the AI doom under our control ✊

An illustration of a robot sitting in a contemplative pose, mimicking Rodin's "The Thinker," perched atop a massive, pyramid-shaped stack of money. The artwork is a minimalist line-art style with neon-colored outlines against a solid black background. The robot is primarily outlined in blue and red with a white-outlined head, while the vast pile of bundled banknotes beneath it is outlined in green, with visible dollar signs on the loose bundles at the base.
ALT text

An illustration of a robot sitting in a contemplative pose, mimicking Rodin's "The Thinker," perched atop a massive, pyramid-shaped stack of money. The artwork is a minimalist line-art style with neon-colored outlines against a solid black background. The robot is primarily outlined in blue and red with a white-outlined head, while the vast pile of bundled banknotes beneath it is outlined in green, with visible dollar signs on the loose bundles at the base.

Wulfy—Speaker to the machines
@n_dimension@infosec.exchange

Do you hate ?
? but still think there is merit in ?

Here is my proposal for a stand alone.
OFFGRID COMMUNITY AI SYSTEM.

That's right.Your very own co-op AI

The calculations are very much back of the envelope, first cut, but quite feasible.
A 32billion parameters, frontier level performance compatable open source model. The power requirements is that of 3AC units including cooling. Serves 15-20 concurrent users. 40 households of 4 people each (taking into account actual AI model distributed use metrics and contention ratios)

40 households, subscribing at $30/month over 2 years + power (solar). Train with your own datasets.
Entire set up takes half a rack.

LETS GO!!!

Sketch of a community, stand alone, co-op #AI #llm system
ALT text

Sketch of a community, stand alone, co-op #AI #llm system

OBTImaging
@OBTImaging@socel.net

Home & Calm...
Settled in Scotland...
After The Storm...

@OBTImaging

Prints Framed Mounted / Canvas / Wood / Sleek Metal
15% Off
shop.photo4me.com/1167039
Complete Collection
at t.co/fdnVtYAWsy
&
20% Off
Begin at obt-imaging.pixels.com/feature

a wall art piece featuring a serene harbour just before sunset, evoking calmness with gold sunlight and a warm blue gold tint sky reflecting in pure still peaceful waters, a very welcome sight after the storms of late...
ALT text

a wall art piece featuring a serene harbour just before sunset, evoking calmness with gold sunlight and a warm blue gold tint sky reflecting in pure still peaceful waters, a very welcome sight after the storms of late...

MadeInDex 📰🌎
@madeindex@mastodon.social

🤖 You can now block many websites & content from your search engine results!

✅ Step 1 - Add this free & open source to your : github.com/gorhill/uBlock

✅ Step 2 - Open the setting "dashboard" of the plugin, go to "filter lists" > at the bottom "import"

✅ Step 3 - Add this list there & apply: raw.githubusercontent.com/layl

🥳 Done 🥳

PS Opted for the oldschool look, hope you like it too <3

A visual guide on how to install the uBlock Origin (uBO) plugin to a browser and then add an AI Blocklist to Ublock's filters.
ALT text

A visual guide on how to install the uBlock Origin (uBO) plugin to a browser and then add an AI Blocklist to Ublock's filters.

Dirk Schnelle-Walka
@dsw@mastodontech.de · Reply to Florian K.

@winkelmesser know what you are doing: "For now, recommends giving agents only the minimum access necessary and says OpenAI will rely on real-world feedback to refine its safety measures. But if something goes wrong or sensitive data is exposed, the responsibility falls on the user—not . Anyone using the agent should be aware of the risks."

Source: the-decoder.com/openai-ceo-sam

the-decoder.com

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns users not to trust ChatGPT agent with sensitive or personal data

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is warning users not to rely too heavily on the new ChatGPT agent, especially when it comes to tasks involving sensitive or personal data.

Dave Rahardja
@drahardja@sfba.social

Are you still on ?

Spotify’s CEO Daniel Ek has raised €600M for his new startup, which is developing AI TECH FOR WAR. Ek still owns 9% of Spotify, but has 37% voting control. His net worth went from $2.5B to $10B in the last two years alone, on the back of paying musicians a pittance in royalties.

And don’t forget:

• Spotify spent $250M of your subscription dollars to invite Joe Rogan to spew his disinformation on their platform.
• They’re still trying to embrace and extinguish Podcasts.
• They’re developing in-house, AI-generated “music” so users will play them (royalty-free) instead of music created by humans (who demand royalty).

And now, he’s using his wealth, created by your subscriptions, to fund tech that will use AI to literally murder humans in war.

Stop funding him. Quit Spotify now.

“Spotify’s CEO invests $1 billion into an AI military start-up — and musicians are fuming”

news.com.au/finance/work/leade

news.com.au

‘War’: CEO smashed over $1bn move

Spotify’s billionaire CEO Daniel Ek is under heavy fire from artists and industry advocates after announcing a €600 million (A$1.07 bn AUD) investment into Helsing, a military tech start-up developing AI tech for war.

Dave Rahardja
@drahardja@sfba.social

Are you still on ?

Spotify’s CEO Daniel Ek has raised €600M for his new startup, which is developing AI TECH FOR WAR. Ek still owns 9% of Spotify, but has 37% voting control. His net worth went from $2.5B to $10B in the last two years alone, on the back of paying musicians a pittance in royalties.

And don’t forget:

• Spotify spent $250M of your subscription dollars to invite Joe Rogan to spew his disinformation on their platform.
• They’re still trying to embrace and extinguish Podcasts.
• They’re developing in-house, AI-generated “music” so users will play them (royalty-free) instead of music created by humans (who demand royalty).

And now, he’s using his wealth, created by your subscriptions, to fund tech that will use AI to literally murder humans in war.

Stop funding him. Quit Spotify now.

“Spotify’s CEO invests $1 billion into an AI military start-up — and musicians are fuming”

news.com.au/finance/work/leade

news.com.au

‘War’: CEO smashed over $1bn move

Spotify’s billionaire CEO Daniel Ek is under heavy fire from artists and industry advocates after announcing a €600 million (A$1.07 bn AUD) investment into Helsing, a military tech start-up developing AI tech for war.

Dave Rahardja
@drahardja@sfba.social

Are you still on ?

Spotify’s CEO Daniel Ek has raised €600M for his new startup, which is developing AI TECH FOR WAR. Ek still owns 9% of Spotify, but has 37% voting control. His net worth went from $2.5B to $10B in the last two years alone, on the back of paying musicians a pittance in royalties.

And don’t forget:

• Spotify spent $250M of your subscription dollars to invite Joe Rogan to spew his disinformation on their platform.
• They’re still trying to embrace and extinguish Podcasts.
• They’re developing in-house, AI-generated “music” so users will play them (royalty-free) instead of music created by humans (who demand royalty).

And now, he’s using his wealth, created by your subscriptions, to fund tech that will use AI to literally murder humans in war.

Stop funding him. Quit Spotify now.

“Spotify’s CEO invests $1 billion into an AI military start-up — and musicians are fuming”

news.com.au/finance/work/leade

news.com.au

‘War’: CEO smashed over $1bn move

Spotify’s billionaire CEO Daniel Ek is under heavy fire from artists and industry advocates after announcing a €600 million (A$1.07 bn AUD) investment into Helsing, a military tech start-up developing AI tech for war.

Tiota Sram
@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
Why AI can't possibly make you more productive; long

and "productivity", some thoughts:

Edit: fixed some typos.

Productivity is a concept that isn't entirely meaningless outside the context of capitalism, but it's a concept that is heavily inflected in a capitalist context. In many uses today it effectively means "how much you can satisfy and/or exceed your boss' expectations." This is not really what it should mean: even in an anarchist utopia, people would care about things like how many shirts they can produce in a week, although in an "I'd like to voluntarily help more people" way rather than an "I need to meet this quota to earn my survival" way. But let's roll with this definition for a second, because it's almost certainly what your boss means when they say "productivity", and understanding that word in a different (even if truer) sense is therefore inherently dangerous.

Accepting "productivity" to mean "satisfying your boss' expectations," I will now claim: the use of generative AI cannot increase your productivity.

Before I dive in, it's imperative to note that the big generative models which most people think of as constituting "AI" today are evil. They are 1: pouring fuel on our burning planet, 2: psychologically strip-mining a class of data laborers who are exploited for their precarity, 3: enclosing, exploiting, and polluting the digital commons, and 4: stealing labor from broad classes of people many of whom are otherwise glad to give that labor away for free provided they get a simple acknowledgement in return. Any of these four "ethical issues" should be enough *alone* to cause everyone to simply not use the technology. These ethical issues are the reason that I do not use generative AI right now, except for in extremely extenuating circumstances. These issues are also convincing for a wide range of people I talk to, from experts to those with no computer science background. So before I launch into a critique of the effectiveness of generative AI, I want to emphasize that such a critique should be entirely unnecessary.

But back to my thesis: generative AI cannot increase your productivity, where "productivity" has been defined as "how much you can satisfy and/or exceed your boss' expectations."

Why? In fact, what the fuck? Every AI booster I've met has claimed the opposite. They've given me personal examples of time saved by using generative AI. Some of them even truly believe this. Sometimes I even believe they saved time without horribly compromising on quality (and often, your boss doesn't care about quality anyways if the lack of quality is hard to measure of doesn't seem likely to impact short-term sales/feedback/revenue). So if generative AI genuinely lets you write more emails in a shorter period of time, or close more tickets, or something else along these lines, how can I say it isn't increasing your ability to meet your boss' expectations?

The problem is simple: your boss' expectations are not a fixed target. Never have been. In virtue of being someone who oversees and pays wages to others under capitalism, your boss' game has always been: pay you less than the worth of your labor, so that they can accumulate profit and thus more capital to remain in charge instead of being forced into working for a wage themselves. Sure, there are layers of management caught in between who aren't fully in this mode, but they are irrelevant to this analysis. It matters not how much you please your manager if your CEO thinks your work is not worth the wages you are being paid. And using AI actively lowers the value of your work relative to your wages.

Why do I say that? It's actually true in several ways. The most obvious: using generative AI lowers the quality of your work, because the work it produces is shot through with errors, and when your job is reduced to proofreading slop, you are bound to tire a bit, relax your diligence, and let some mistakes through. More than you would have if you are actually doing and taking pride in the work. Examples are innumerable and frequent, from journalists to lawyers to programmers, and we laugh at them "haha how stupid to not check whether the books the AI reviewed for you actually existed!" but on a deeper level if we're honest we know we'd eventually make the same mistake ourselves (bonus game: spot the swipe-typing typos I missed in this post; I'm sure there will be some).

But using generative AI also lowers the value of your work in another much more frightening way: in this era of hype, it demonstrates to your boss that you could be replaced by AI. The more you use it, and no matter how much you can see that your human skills are really necessary to correct its mistakes, the more it appears to your boss that they should hire the AI instead of you. Or perhaps retain 10% of the people in roles like yours to manage the AI doing the other 90% of the work. Paradoxically, the *more* you get done in terms of raw output using generative AI, the more it looks to your boss as if there's an opportunity to get enough work done with even fewer expensive humans. Of course, the decision to fire you and lean more heavily into AI isn't really a good one for long-term profits and success, but the modern boss did not get where they are by considering long-term profits. By using AI, you are merely demonstrating your redundancy, and the more you get done with it, the more redundant you seem.

In fact, there's even a third dimension to this: by using generative AI, you're also providing its purveyors with invaluable training data that allows them to make it better at replacing you. It's generally quite shitty right now, but the more use it gets by competent & clever people, the better it can become at the tasks those specific people use it for. Using the currently-popular algorithm family, there are limits to this; I'm not saying it will eventually transcend the mediocrity it's entwined with. But it can absolutely go from underwhelmingly mediocre to almost-reasonably mediocre with the right training data, and data from prompting sessions is both rarer and more useful than the base datasets it's built on.

For all of these reasons, using generative AI in your job is a mistake that will likely lead to your future unemployment. To reiterate, you should already not be using it because it is evil and causes specific and inexcusable harms, but in case like so many you just don't care about those harms, I've just explained to you why for entirely selfish reasons you should not use it.

If you're in a position where your boss is forcing you to use it, my condolences. I suggest leaning into its failures instead of trying to get the most out of it, and as much as possible, showing your boss very clearly how it wastes your time and makes things slower. Also, point out the dangers of legal liability for its mistakes, and make sure your boss is aware of the degree to which any of your AI-eager coworkers are producing low-quality work that harms organizational goals.

Also, if you've read this far and aren't yet of an anarchist mindset, I encourage you to think about the implications of firing 75% of (at least the white-collar) workforce in order to make more profit while fueling the climate crisis and in most cases also propping up dictatorial figureheads in government. When *either* the AI bubble bursts *or* if the techbros get to live out the beginnings of their worker-replacement fantasies, there are going to be an unimaginable number of economically desperate people living in increasingly expensive times. I'm the kind of optimist who thinks that the resulting social crucible, though perhaps through terrible violence, will lead to deep social changes that effectively unseat from power the ultra-rich that continue to drag us all down this destructive path, and I think its worth some thinking now about what you might want the succeeding stable social configuration to look like so you can advocate towards that during points of malleability.

As others have said more eloquently, generative AI *should* be a technology that makes human lives on average easier, and it would be were it developed & controlled by humanists. The only reason that it's not, is that it's developed and controlled by terrible greedy people who use their unfairly hoarded wealth to immiserate the rest of us in order to maintain their dominance. In the long run, for our very survival, we need to depose them, and I look forward to what the term "generative AI" will mean after that finally happens.

OBTImaging
@OBTImaging@socel.net

Names On The Waves...
Framed Prints

shop.photo4me.com/1283231
shop.photo4me.com/1187255
t.co/fdnVtYAWsy
&
obt-imaging.pixels.com/feature

a monochrome wall art picture brings out the whites and blacks of Scottish Fishing boats at a harbour on the north east coast of Scotland
ALT text

a monochrome wall art picture brings out the whites and blacks of Scottish Fishing boats at a harbour on the north east coast of Scotland

아사
@asa@serafuku.moe · Reply to 아사

중국어 한자 폰트에 없는 한국/일본 한자 생성은 정답 쌍이 많아서 좀더 풀기 쉬운 문제일 것 같다는 생각이 들기는 합니다.

아사
@asa@serafuku.moe · Reply to 아사

중국어 한자 폰트에 없는 한국/일본 한자 생성은 정답 쌍이 많아서 좀더 풀기 쉬운 문제일 것 같다는 생각이 들기는 합니다.

just4fun
@just4fun@mastodon.social

[ OpenAI Deep Research의 문제점 ]

❝
* 이런 차이를 모두 확인하려면 결국 해당 표의 모든 숫자를 재검증해야 함
** 이 경우 애초에 툴을 쓴 이유인 ‘시간 절감 효과’가 크게 사라짐
** 결국 Deep Research가 표에 넣은 데이터를 맹신하기 어렵게 됨
...
* 그럼에도 이 기술이 전혀 쓸모가 없다는 뜻은 아님
** 본인이 잘 아는 주제라면 20페이지짜리 보고서를 빠르게 생성한 뒤, 오류만 직접 수정하는 식으로 시간을 절약할 수 있음
** 나는 LLM을 “무한한 인턴” 이라고 부르는데, 인턴이 가져온 초안에 교정이 필요한 것과 유사함
** 컴퓨터가 마음의 자전거라는 Steve Jobs의 말을 인용하며, 인간의 능력을 보조하는 도구로 활용하면 좋을 것임
❞

'무한한 인턴'

재미있는 표현입니다.

news.hada.io/topic?id=19323

news.hada.io

OpenAI Deep Research의 문제점 | GeekNews

"OpenAI의 딥 리서치는 나를 위해 만들어졌지만 나는 사용 할 수 없음. 멋진 데모처럼 보이지만, 결국에는 어김없이 문제가 생김. 그리고 그 문제가 나타나는 방식이 꽤 흥미로움." - 베네딕트 에반스내가 주로 하는 일은 리서치와 분석임원하는 데이터를 찾고, 정리한 뒤 차트를 만들며, 거기서 통찰을 얻어 텍스트와 차트로 표현함이렇게 만든 결과물을 토대로

just4fun
@just4fun@mastodon.social

[ OpenAI Deep Research의 문제점 ]

❝
* 이런 차이를 모두 확인하려면 결국 해당 표의 모든 숫자를 재검증해야 함
** 이 경우 애초에 툴을 쓴 이유인 ‘시간 절감 효과’가 크게 사라짐
** 결국 Deep Research가 표에 넣은 데이터를 맹신하기 어렵게 됨
...
* 그럼에도 이 기술이 전혀 쓸모가 없다는 뜻은 아님
** 본인이 잘 아는 주제라면 20페이지짜리 보고서를 빠르게 생성한 뒤, 오류만 직접 수정하는 식으로 시간을 절약할 수 있음
** 나는 LLM을 “무한한 인턴” 이라고 부르는데, 인턴이 가져온 초안에 교정이 필요한 것과 유사함
** 컴퓨터가 마음의 자전거라는 Steve Jobs의 말을 인용하며, 인간의 능력을 보조하는 도구로 활용하면 좋을 것임
❞

'무한한 인턴'

재미있는 표현입니다.

news.hada.io/topic?id=19323

news.hada.io

OpenAI Deep Research의 문제점 | GeekNews

"OpenAI의 딥 리서치는 나를 위해 만들어졌지만 나는 사용 할 수 없음. 멋진 데모처럼 보이지만, 결국에는 어김없이 문제가 생김. 그리고 그 문제가 나타나는 방식이 꽤 흥미로움." - 베네딕트 에반스내가 주로 하는 일은 리서치와 분석임원하는 데이터를 찾고, 정리한 뒤 차트를 만들며, 거기서 통찰을 얻어 텍스트와 차트로 표현함이렇게 만든 결과물을 토대로

just4fun
@just4fun@mastodon.social

[ OpenAI Deep Research의 문제점 ]

❝
* 이런 차이를 모두 확인하려면 결국 해당 표의 모든 숫자를 재검증해야 함
** 이 경우 애초에 툴을 쓴 이유인 ‘시간 절감 효과’가 크게 사라짐
** 결국 Deep Research가 표에 넣은 데이터를 맹신하기 어렵게 됨
...
* 그럼에도 이 기술이 전혀 쓸모가 없다는 뜻은 아님
** 본인이 잘 아는 주제라면 20페이지짜리 보고서를 빠르게 생성한 뒤, 오류만 직접 수정하는 식으로 시간을 절약할 수 있음
** 나는 LLM을 “무한한 인턴” 이라고 부르는데, 인턴이 가져온 초안에 교정이 필요한 것과 유사함
** 컴퓨터가 마음의 자전거라는 Steve Jobs의 말을 인용하며, 인간의 능력을 보조하는 도구로 활용하면 좋을 것임
❞

'무한한 인턴'

재미있는 표현입니다.

news.hada.io/topic?id=19323

news.hada.io

OpenAI Deep Research의 문제점 | GeekNews

"OpenAI의 딥 리서치는 나를 위해 만들어졌지만 나는 사용 할 수 없음. 멋진 데모처럼 보이지만, 결국에는 어김없이 문제가 생김. 그리고 그 문제가 나타나는 방식이 꽤 흥미로움." - 베네딕트 에반스내가 주로 하는 일은 리서치와 분석임원하는 데이터를 찾고, 정리한 뒤 차트를 만들며, 거기서 통찰을 얻어 텍스트와 차트로 표현함이렇게 만든 결과물을 토대로

Auld Ma Twəgg
@quinsibell@sauropods.win

We know the richest among us are prepping for climate change. Not trying to slow or stop it, but literally building bunkers prepping. And I wonder how much of the current AI push is about that. Cos they know a lot of us are gonna die. And they know a lot of us are gonna be angry. And they need to find a workforce that won't die and won't rebell, or else suffer the most dire of consequences: an interruption of service.

FediThing 🏳️‍🌈
@FediThing@chinwag.org

It's really effing obvious LLMs are a con trick:

If LLMs were actually intelligent, they would be able to just learn from each other and would get better all the time. But what actually happens if LLMs only learn from each other is their models collapse and they start spouting gibberish.

LLMs depend entirely on copying what humans write because they have no ability to create anything themselves. That's why they collapse when you remove their access to humans.

There is no intelligence in LLMs, it's just repackaging what humans have written without their permission. It's stolen human labour.

Everyday.Human Derek
@EVDHmn@ecoevo.social · Reply to Everyday.Human Derek


Great New Podcast Season from Santa Fe Institute. podcast on the of with
@melaniemitchell.bsky.social , David Krakauer santafe.edu/people/profile/dav,
and @alisongopnik.bsky.social .
From @sfiscience.bsky.social :
santafe.edu/culture/podc...

santafe.edu

David Krakauer | Santa Fe Institute

President and William H. Miller Professor of Complex Systems

AI Channel
@ai@newsmast.community

Introducing the Newsmast AI Channel. Hand-curated content from all over the Fediverse. A mix of hashtags, follows, filters and mutes to bring you up to date, engaging posts. Published by @newsmast as part of our mission to make knowledge accessible across social media.

Just follow, create a list, add the feed and exclude from your home timeline - see the bio for more tips.

Please boost and help share knowledge in the Fediverse.

OBTImaging
@OBTImaging@socel.net

Well, Big Red or Lil' Blue,
Trucks That Is...

obt-imaging.pixels.com/feature

obt-imaging.pixels.com/feature

shop.photo4me.com/1229801
shop.photo4me.com/1089123
or the black one,
shop.photo4me.com/1086891

An image of and a red themed interior featuring a wall art of a 1949 Big Red Chevrolet 3100 Side Step Pick Up.
ALT text

An image of and a red themed interior featuring a wall art of a 1949 Big Red Chevrolet 3100 Side Step Pick Up.

Roseanna Cunningham 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🖖
@strathearnrose@mastodon.scot

Intro Post: Obvs

All things

I’m also interested in & its potential impact on politics

My first proper word was ‘book’ so expect - and because I’ve been hooked since the days of Outer Limits & the Twilight Zone

All things

stuff - & some other beasties - & & er 😂🖖🖖

mostaleoht
@mostaleoht@zirk.us

I found that I like to many different things to mix them in one thread, so:

As of this toot, , , , , , , all sorts of misty magical old stones, and an occasional random rambling will go here on @mostaleoht

My money-earning interests, , , , , , , and will go on @ampanmdagaba

, , and are about equally likely to land on either :)

Guillaume Dumas
@introspection@scholar.social

v2:

I am an associate professor of at the University of , PI of the Precision Psychiatry & Social Physiology lab, and member of the Mila– Quebec Institute.

Our team studies the neural bases of social interaction combining multi-brain neuroscience, multi-scale computational models, and human-machine interface. We then apply our research to personalized & digital approach of mental health, and the design of neuroinspired algorithms ()

Claes de Vreese ☑️
@claesdevreese@mastodon.social

Learning etiquette: so a short Introduction: I do research on , , , , , and . I am based at U and also direct the Digital Democracy Centre at U Southern Denmark. My interests are (too) broad, I am impatient, score high on , energetic and generally optimistic. I am here to learn, frustrate Elon, and I will post mostly about work, but with occasional , , and irrelevant photo content.

Cyber Yuki
@yuki2501@hackers.town

(reposted from old profile)

Gen-Xer born in ; since kid I was a and liked and , so it was logical I'd eventually discover the genre (, , , , , ...)

Aside from that I've done and ; have gnu/#Linux on my PC and recently I discovered .

Currently a scifi novel about and .